Plonger du bord de la langue. Maîtrise et déprise énonciatives chez Pascal Quignard
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article propose d’interroger les limites de la phrase quignardienne à partir de certaines formes récurrentes : brachylogies, sommaires, asyndètes, les « bienfaits du fragment » dans l’attaque — globalement, un travail syntaxique instruisant sa propre disjonction. Par cette cartographie des formes disjonctives, on observe un effet paradoxal d’imprévisibilité ou d’indécidable — c’est, en somme, la rhétorique du traité : « pas de but, pas de stratégie, pas de conscience » ( Petits traités i ). Cette rhétorique est paradoxale, parce qu’elle est mise au service d’un discours extrêmement maîtrisé dans son dessein général — une maîtrise que l’on constate dans la lecture de Quignard par le monde universitaire, qui se sert généralement des outils d’analyse présents dans le texte. Sans contester cette maîtrise, cette étude propose de la lire autrement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".