MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2801787004 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2016-0006

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE VIBRATIONS OF A SIMPLY SUPPORTED ROD IMMERSED IN AN AXIAL FLOW WITH A NOZZLE MIDWAY

2016· article· en· W2801787004 on OpenAlexaffvenue
William Zrymiak, Mark Siminowski, Brahim Chebbi

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration and Dynamic Analysis
Canadian institutionsLaurentian UniversityAlgonquin College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNozzleVibrationMechanicsFlow (mathematics)AmplitudeStructural engineeringAcousticsVortex-induced vibrationMaterials sciencePhysicsEngineeringMechanical engineeringOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Experiments to study the induced vibrations of a simply supported rod resulting from an axial flow with a constricting nozzle midway are described. Nozzles with different geometries are used. The results are compared to published data in the literature. It is shown that the vibration of this rod for a particular flow velocity beyond the critical value changes both direction and trajectory. It is also shown that machining cuts on a particular mounted nozzle helps suppress the amplitude of the flow induced vibrations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.689
Threshold uncertainty score0.981

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicVibration and Dynamic AnalysisFrench-language works237,207