MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2801788219 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2013-0061

A STUDY ON THERMAL INITIAL PROPERTIES FOR INVERSE TECHNIQUE

2013· article· en· W2801788219 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sung-Deok Hong, Chansoo Kim, Migyung Cho, Cheolho Bai, Sung-Yull Hong, Jaesool Shim

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNumerical methods in inverse problems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvergence (economics)InverseSensitivity (control systems)Thermal conductionThermal conductivityLevenberg–Marquardt algorithmInverse problemStability (learning theory)Applied mathematicsThermalMathematicsMaterials scienceComputer scienceMathematical analysisThermodynamicsPhysicsEngineeringArtificial neural networkGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Levenberg–Marguardt algorithm is used to study on convergence for inverse heat conduction in the unsteady state. In this model, the finite volume method is used to obtain an estimated temperature, which is necessary for minimizing inverse error. Six simulations were performed to investigate the sensitivity to initial thermo-physical properties such as thermal conductivity (k) and heat capacity (ρCp = C) by changing three different damping ratios of the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm. Our results show that an appropriate selection of thermal-physical properties and damping ratio helps numerical stability and convergence and reduces convergence time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicNumerical methods in inverse problemsFrench-language works237,207