MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2801810755 · doi:10.14419/ijet.v7i2.17.11560

Analysis of MRI Data of Brain for CAD System

2018· article· en· W2801810755 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Girish D Bonde, Dr Manish Jain

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Engineering & Technology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBrain Tumor Detection and Classification
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsCADComputer scienceMagnetic resonance imagingSegmentationSupport vector machineArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Brain cancerVariety (cybernetics)Machine learningMedicineCancerRadiologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technologies are currently one of the most effective tools in the diagnosis of a wide variety of socially significant pathologies including cancer, arteriosclerosis, episodes. Ischemic and neurodegenerative diseases [1, 2, 3, 4].This paper gives detailed idea of pre-processing, and segmentation(FCM, soft and hard) of MRI brain tumor images. This paper also insights the machine learning(SOM, NN and SVM) approach for automatic classification(PTPSA, fBM) of brain tissues. Different performance evaluation parameter and similarity metrics are discuss to define the efficiency of computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Engineering & TechnologySame topicBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationFrench-language works237,207