Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans un essai, Les passages obligés de l’écriture migrante (2002), je faisais valoir que les braconnages identitaires représentaient un discours pertinent dans le débat sur les lieux habités de l’écriture migrante. De manière décisive, les analyses de l’écriture migrante au Québec mettent l'accent sur la relation entre l'expression d'un discours traumatique et le déplacement. Ainsi, on sous-estime les motifs du jeu et des faux-semblants identitaires. Bien sûr, il existe quelques exceptions à ce discours décidément fort sombre. Pensons aux récits, nouvelles et romans de Pan Bouyoucas, auteur que l’on peut ranger, pour des motifs sociologiques et statistiques, dans la catégorie des auteurs migrants. L’argument du récit à l'étude L’autre (2001) est net : qu’arrive-t-il lorsqu'un alter ego s’immisce peu à peu dans votre vie, puis prend carrément votre place?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".