MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2801848447 · doi:10.14740/jh402w

Pegloticase Induced Hemolytic Anemia in a Patient With G6PD Deficiency

2018· article· en· W2801848447 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Michael Adashek, Khalil Bourji

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hematology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Health and Biochemistry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGoutMedicineAllopurinolUric acidXanthine oxidaseInternal medicineHyperuricemiaPurineAnemiaUrate oxidaseFebuxostatEndocrinologyGlucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiencyArthritisGastroenterologyBiochemistryEnzymeChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gout is a metabolic disorder of purine metabolism that results in crystallization of uric acid in the form of monosodium urate crystals, affects 8.3 million Americans and is the most common cause of inflammatory arthritis in adults. Urate lowering therapy is the mainstay of treatment for chronic gout. Initial treatments of choice in gout include allopurinol, a purine analog which inhibits xanthine oxidase and decreases the production of uric acid as well as probenecid which increases the urinary excretion of uric acid. However, 3% of patients will fail these treatments. In 2010, pegloticase, a recombinant urate oxidase conjugated to polyethylene glycol, was approved for these patients. Pegloticase has been shown to rapidly normalize plasma uric acid values, resolve tophi and improve quality of life in these patients. Hereby we present a case of a 50-year-old African male admitted to the hospital with symptomatic anemia 1 week after pegloticase infusion. He was found to have glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, predisposing him to hemolytic anemia. Hereby we discuss his clinical course, and suggest glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency screening prior to pegloticase infusion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HematologySame topicNeonatal Health and BiochemistryFrench-language works237,207