Les grands défis du Mexique face au Partenariat transpacifique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le Mexique a lié son destin à ceux de ses voisins nord-américains par la signature de l’Accord de libre-échange nord-américain (Aléna). Cependant, avec la forte croissance économique qu’enregistre la région pacifique de l’Asie, le Mexique se cherche un nouvel élan. C’est par son insertion dans les dynamiques commerciales actuelles, notamment par la promotion et la participation à des négociations comme celles de l’Alliance du Pacifique (ptp) entre pays latino-américains, mais plus particulièrement par sa participation à la construction du Partenariat transpacifique (ptp), signé le 4 février 2016, que le Mexique cherche à préserver sa position comme plateforme incontournable du commerce et des investissements internationaux associés aux chaînes de valeur des États-Unis. Cet article propose une analyse des motifs qui ont poussé le Mexique à intégrer le ptp ainsi que des opportunités et des défis qui en découlent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".