Free vibration analysis of coupled sloshing-flexible membrane system in a liquid container
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A finite element model is developed to study free vibration of a liquid in a tank of arbitrary geometry with a flexible membrane constraining the liquid free-surface. A variational formulation is initially developed using the Galerkin method, assuming inviscid, incompressible and irrotational flow. The resulting generalized eigenvalue problem is then reduced by considering only the elements on the liquid free-surface, which significantly reduces the computational time. The proposed physical model is subsequently implemented into the FEniCS framework to obtain coupled hydroelastic liquid-membrane frequencies and modes. The coupled frequencies are compared with those reported for rectangular and upright cylindrical tanks using analytical methods in order to illustrate the validity of the finite element model. The results are subsequently presented for a horizontal cylindrical tank with an elastic free-surface membrane for different fill ratios and tank lengths. The effects of the membrane tension on the free vibration of the liquid in the tank are further investigated by comparing the coupled liquid-membrane frequencies with slosh frequencies of the liquid alone. It is shown that sloshing frequencies can be effectively shifted to higher values to prevent resonance in partially filled moving containers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it