Free vibration analysis of coupled sloshing-flexible membrane system in a liquid container
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A finite element model is developed to study free vibration of a liquid in a tank of arbitrary geometry with a flexible membrane constraining the liquid free-surface. A variational formulation is initially developed using the Galerkin method, assuming inviscid, incompressible and irrotational flow. The resulting generalized eigenvalue problem is then reduced by considering only the elements on the liquid free-surface, which significantly reduces the computational time. The proposed physical model is subsequently implemented into the FEniCS framework to obtain coupled hydroelastic liquid-membrane frequencies and modes. The coupled frequencies are compared with those reported for rectangular and upright cylindrical tanks using analytical methods in order to illustrate the validity of the finite element model. The results are subsequently presented for a horizontal cylindrical tank with an elastic free-surface membrane for different fill ratios and tank lengths. The effects of the membrane tension on the free vibration of the liquid in the tank are further investigated by comparing the coupled liquid-membrane frequencies with slosh frequencies of the liquid alone. It is shown that sloshing frequencies can be effectively shifted to higher values to prevent resonance in partially filled moving containers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".