Brain-derived erythropoietin protects from intermittent hypoxia-induced cardiorespiratory dysfunction and oxidative stress in mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Study Objectives: Based on the fact that erythropoietin (Epo) administration in rodents protects against spatial learning and cognitive deficits induced by chronic intermittent hypoxia (CIH)-mediated oxidative damage, here we tested the hypothesis that Epo in the brain protects against cardiorespiratory disorders and oxidative stress induced by CIH in adult mice. Methods: Adult control and transgenic mice overexpressing Epo in the brain only (Tg21) were exposed to CIH (21%-10% O2-10 cycles/hour-8 hours/day-7 days) or room air. After CIH exposure, we used the tail cuff method to measure arterial pressure, and whole-body plethysmography to assess the frequency of apneic episodes at rest, minute ventilation, and ventilatory responses to hypoxia and hypercapnia. Finally, the activity of pro-oxidant (XO-xanthine oxidase, and NADPH) and antioxidant (super oxide dismutase) enzymes was evaluated in the cerebral cortex and brainstem. Results: Exposure of control mice to CIH significantly increased the heart rate and arterial pressure, the number of apneic events, and the ventilatory response to hypoxia and hypercapnia. Furthermore, CIH increased the ratio of pro-oxidant to antioxidant enzymes in cortex and brainstem tissues. Both physiological and molecular changes induced by CIH were prevented in transgenic Tg21 mice. Conclusions: We conclude that the neuroprotective effect of Epo prevents oxidative damage in the brain and cardiorespiratory disorders induced by CIH. Considering that Epo is used in clinics to treat chronic kidney disease and stroke, our data show convincing evidence suggesting that Epo may be a promising alternative drug to treat sleep-disorder breathing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".