MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2801963876

The Effects of Air-Cooled Blast Furnace Slag (ACBFS) Aggregate on the Chemistry of Pore Solution and the Interfacial Transition Zone

2017· article· en· W2801963876 on OpenAlex
Parth Panchmatia

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePurdue e-Pubs (Purdue University) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAggregate (composite)Slag (welding)ChemistryBlast furnaceMetallurgyGround granulated blast-furnace slagMaterials scienceComposite materialCement
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Numerous laboratory and field studies have demonstrated that concrete incorporating air cooled blast furnace slag (ACBFS) aggregate showed a higher degree of infilling of voids with ettringite as opposed to concrete prepared using naturally mined carbonate aggregates when exposed to similar environmental conditions. This observation prompted some to link the deterioration observed in the ACBFS aggregate concrete structures to the compromised freeze-thaw resistance due to infilling of air voids. Concerns about the release of sulfur from ACBFS aggregate into the pore solution of concrete had been presented as the reason for the observed ettringite deposits in the air voids. However, literature quantifying the influence of ACBFS aggregate on the chemistry of the pore solution of concrete is absent. Therefore, the main purpose of this research was to quantify the effects of ACBFS aggregate on the chemistry of the pore solution of mortars incorporating them. Coarse and crushed ACBFS aggregates were submerged in artificial pore solutions (APSs) representing pore solutions of 3-day, 7-day, and 28-day hydrated plain, binary, and ternary paste systems. The change in the chemistry of these artificial pore solutions was recorded to quantify the chemical contribution of ACBFS aggregate to the pore solution of concrete. It was observed that the sulfate concentration of all APSs increased once they were in contact with either coarse or crushed ACBFS aggregate. After 28 days of contact, the increase in sulfate concentration of the APSs ranged from 4.85 – 12.23 mmol/L and 14.21 – 16.87 mmol/L for contact with coarse and crushed ACBFS aggregate, respectively. More than 40% of the total sulfate that was released by the ACBFS aggregate occurred during the first 72 hours (3 days) of its contact with the APSs. There was little or no difference in the amount of sulfate released from ACBFS aggregate in the different types of APSs. In other words, the type of binder solution from which pore solution was extracted had no effect on the amount of sulfate that was released when it was in contact with ACBFS aggregate. The relatively quick release of sulfur from ACBFS aggregate into the APSs prompted investigation of the chemical composition of the pore solution of mortar (at early stages of hydration) incorporating ACBFS aggregate. The chemical composition of the pore solutions obtained from mortars prepared using ACBFS aggregate and plain and binary paste matrices was compared those of mortars prepared using Ottawa sand and plain and binary paste matrices. After 7 days of hydration, the sulfur (S) concentration of the pore solution extracted from mortars prepared using ACBFS aggregate was 3.4 – 5.6 times greater than that obtained from corresponding mortars (i.e. mortars with the same paste matrix) prepared using Ottawa sand. Binary mortars containing fly ash (FA) showed the lowest S content after 7 days of hydration amongst all mortars prepared using ACBFS aggregate. On the other hand, binary mortars prepared using slag cement (SC) and ACBFS aggregate had the highest S concentration after 7 days of hydration. These effects on the S concentration in the pore solutions can be explained by the difference in the chemical makeup of the binders, and not because of different rate of release of S from ACBFS into the pore solution. In addition, TGA analysis of 7-day hydrated mortars revealed that the ettringite, monosulfate, and calcium hydroxide content was lower in mortars prepared using ACBFS aggregate as opposed to those prepared using Ottawa sand. This could be because of the low degree of hydration in mortars with ACBFS aggregate because of the high sulfate concentration in its pore solution. The properties of the interfacial transition zone (ITZ), i.e. the zone in the vicinity of the aggregate surface, depends on the property of the aggregate such as its porosity and texture. Therefore, it is expected that the properties of ITZ around the ACBFS particle, which is porous and proven to contribute sulfate, be different from the ITZ around the naturally mined siliceous aggregate. Image analysis conducted on backscattered images obtained using scanning electron microscope revealed that the ITZ of naturally mined siliceous aggregate was more porous compared to the ITZ of ACBFS aggregate. In addition, calcium hydroxide deposits were more frequent and larger in size in the ITZ around siliceous sand than in the case of the ITZ around the ACBFS aggregate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.709
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.153
Teacher spread0.150 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it