MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802062489 · doi:10.1080/19320248.2018.1464998

The costs of local food procurement in a Northern Canadian First Nation community: an affordable strategy to food security?

2018· article· en· W2802062489 on OpenAlex
Michael Leibovitch Randazzo, Michael A. Robidoux

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersMitacs
KeywordsProcurementIndigenousFood securityBusinessFood systemsEconomic growthAgricultureGeographyEconomicsMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Northern rural and remote Indigenous Communities in Canada are experiencing disproportionately high rates of diet related diseases, such as type 2 diabetes, largely because of the limited access to nutritious food. Indigenous peoples have experienced a rapid nutrition transition that has led to an over reliance on low quality market-food. In one remote fly-in First Nation in northern Ontario, leadership has looked to land-based food as a way to make healthy foods more readily available in the community. This paper documents what is involved in land-based food procurement in the Wapekeka First Nation, and the costs incurred getting food from the land. This paper argues that despite the considerable economic and physical demands, land-based food procurement is a viable and culturally valuable option to help increase local access to healthy foods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it