MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802100677 · doi:10.21573/vol34n12018.82469

Gestão da Educação a Distância na universidade pública como campo de disputa: da instituição social à academia líquida

2018· article· pt· W2802100677 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Brasileira de Política e Administração da Educação - Periódico científico editado pela ANPAE · 2018
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Public Policy
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTypologyPolitical scienceHumanitiesSociologyPublic institutionPublic universityInstitutionPublic administrationSocial sciencePhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resumo: O texto é uma reflexão teórico-crítica sobre as mais convencionais tipologias de Gestão da Educação a Distância nas instituições públicas de ensino superior brasileiras, fomentando alternativas pela universidade como instituição social. Numa abordagem eminentemente teórica, buscou-se confrontar a visão de universidade pública como instituição social àquela de organização social, tal qual preconiza o Estado neoliberal. Na análise, é apresentada a migração da tipologia, da lógica de universidade como instituição social para a da academia líquida, a partir das tipologias de gestão que se tem adotado.Palavras-chave: Educação a Distância. Gestão. Políticas Públicas. Universidade Pública. Abstract: The text is a critical reflection on the most conventional typologies of Distance Learning Management in Brazilian public higher education institutions, discussing alternatives for the university as a social institution. In this theoretical discussion, the attempt was made to collide the ideas of the public university as a social institution and social organization, as advocated by the neoliberal State. In the analysis, it is presented the migration of the typology, from the logic of university as a social institution to that of the fluid academy, from the typologies of management that have been adopted.Keywords: distance learning; management; public policies; public university. Resumén: El texto es una reflexión teórico-crítica sobre las más convencionales tipologías de Gestión de la Educación a Distancia en las instituciones públicas de enseñanza superior brasileñas, fomentando alternativas por la universidad como institución social. En un enfoque eminentemente teórico, se buscó confrontar la visión de la universidad pública como institución social a la de organización social, tal cual preconiza el Estado neoliberal. En el análisis, se presenta la migración de la tipología, de la lógica de universidad como institución social a la de la academia líquida, a partir de las tipologías de gestión que se han adoptado.Palabras clave: Educación a distancia. Gestión. Políticas públicas. Universidad Pública.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.290
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0070.007
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0060.001
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it