MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802124425 · doi:10.1080/15226514.2017.1393389

The fate of DDT in soils treated with hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HPβCD)

2018· article· en· W2802124425 on OpenAlexaff
Carolina P. Dahmer, Allison Rutter, Barbara A. Zeeb

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Phytoremediation · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactants
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental chemistryBioavailabilityChemistryEnvironmental remediationSoil waterPhytoremediationPesticideContaminationSoil contaminationTriclocarbanEisenia fetidaEnvironmental scienceAgronomyEcologyTriclosanToxicityBiologySoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Point Pelee National Park (PPNP) is highly contaminated with dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) due to the historical use of this persistent organochlorine pesticide. Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HPβCD) has previously been investigated for its role in the remediation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). In the present study, HPβCD's ability to promote DDT microbial degradation, enhance DDT phytoextraction by two native grasses (Schizachyrium scoparium and Panicum virgatum), and increase DDT bioavailability to redworms (Eisenia fetida) was investigated. Using a range of HPβCD concentrations (2.5% to 10%), it was determined that it did not promote DDT microbial degradation in PPNP soils, however, it was able enhance the DDT phytoextraction ability of S. scoparium plants due to the increased water solubility of DDT. Although HPβCD application to PPNP soil did not increase DDT bioavailability to redworms, its enhanced solubility allowed it to move through the soil column, and hence groundwater contamination is a possibility. Due to this important issue, in situ use of HPβCD to remediate DDT contamination is not recommended unless measures are in place to mitigate movement into groundwater.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.315

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of PhytoremediationSame topicMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactantsFrench-language works237,207