MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802162151 · doi:10.1049/iet-ipr.2018.0043

Entropy‐based variational Bayes learning framework for data clustering

2018· article· en· W2802162151 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Image Processing · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersTaif UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCluster analysisBayes' theoremComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceEntropy (arrow of time)Naive Bayes classifierMachine learningPattern recognition (psychology)Bayesian probabilityPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel framework is developed for the modelling and clustering of proportional data (i.e. normalised histograms) based on the Beta‐Liouville mixture model. This framework is based on incremental model selection, by testing if a given component was truly Beta‐Liouville distributed. Specifically, the authors compare the theoretical maximum entropy of the given component with the estimated entropy obtained by the MeanNN estimator. If a significant difference was gained from this comparison, this component is considered as not well fitted and is then splitted into two new components with a proper initialisation. Our approach is tested through synthetic data sets and real‐world applications which involve human gesture recognition and vehicle tracking for traffic monitoring purposes, which demonstrate that the authors' approach is superior to comparable techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it