A Rotation-Invariant Convolutional Neural Network for Image Enhancement Forensics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many proposed complex convolutional neural network (CNN) models in image forensics are with a large number of parameters, requiring a huge number of training data and having the risk of being overfitting. Considering the desired rotation invariance in the detection of some specific image manipulations, i.e., image enhancement, we propose employing convolutional filters with an isotropic architecture in the CNN model which can significantly reduce the required number of CNN parameters. With the same weights in symmetric positions, the proposed filter can extract rotation-invariant features for image enhancement forensics. Experimental results show that the proposed rotation-invariant CNN models with much less parameters can achieve much better performance, e.g., yielding more than 13% improvement in terms of detection accuracy in Gamma correction forensics. It also achieves significantly better generalization performances on different databases and better robustness against JPEG compression when compared with the popular BayarNet in [16].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it