MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802182702 · doi:10.22323/1.282.0494

Recent Results and Status of EXO-200 and the nEXO Experiment

2017· article· en· W2802182702 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of 38th International Conference on High Energy Physics — PoS(ICHEP2016) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungNational Science Foundation
KeywordsDetectorTime projection chamberIsolation (microbiology)Phase (matter)Double beta decayEnvironmental scienceProjection (relational algebra)XenonComputer sciencePhysicsParticle physicsOpticsNuclear physicsAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The EXO-200 experiment is searching for neutrinoless double beta decay using a time projection chamber filled with liquid xenon enriched in Xe-136. The detector has demonstrated exceptional performance with world leading measurements and stringent search results. The detector finished its Phase-I running shortly after an unexpected interruption in operations caused by incidents at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, but has restarted in Phase-II with hardware upgrades. During the two-year hiatus, the EXO-200 collaboration published several results using data from Phase-I. This article reports on the recent results and status of this detector, as well as on the proposed nEXO detector, the next generation experiment rooted in the success of EXO-200.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.632
Threshold uncertainty score0.750

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it