BIOMECHANICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MUSCULAR AND POSTURAL REGULATION OF CONDITIONALLY LIGHTWEIGHT WEIGHTLIFTERS DURING THE BASIC PERIOD OF TRAINING
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim: to assess speed-strength motor capacity of flexors and extensors of knee and hip joints, angles of force applications, and muscular performance in weightlifters. Materials and Methods. Polydynamometer produced by Biodex (USA) allows the basic, comparative, and graphic assessment of joint indicators of the upper and lower limbs (flexion-extension) at an angular speed of 150,120,920 deg/s. We examined 6 weightlifters (body weight 63.00±0.98 kg; body length 173.00±1.75 cm) qualified as Candidates for Master of Sport (n=4) and Master of Sport (n=2), aged 18.22±1.74. Results. Integrative assessment of isokinetic testing revealed that desyncrhonization and imbalance of statokinetic stability starts from the muscle system, its angular, temporal, and rotation characteristics, range of movement, dynamical instability of joints, and receptor ratio of groups of muscles participating in motor actions. These integrations are the trigger that leads to disturbances in supporting systems and shifts in indicators as seen from the comparison of involved and uninvolved elements, joint flexion and extension, and deficiency. Conclusion. The used diagnostic equipment allows the determination of muscular imbalance, assessment of structural and physiological capacity, and estimate biomechanical features including differentiation of efforts at various angular accelerations and force application.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".