MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802222080 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2017-0043

Time delay control of cable-driven manipulators with artificial bee colony algorithm

2018· article· en· W2802222080 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fei Yan, Yaoyao Wang, Wei Xu, Bai Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration and Dynamic Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersState Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic SystemsGovernment of Jiangsu ProvinceNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPID controllerControl theory (sociology)WorkspacePayload (computing)Artificial bee colony algorithmController (irrigation)Computer scienceControl engineeringRobotControl (management)EngineeringTemperature controlArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cable-driven manipulators (CDM) are widely-used for their unique advantages such as light weight, low moving mass, high payload-to-weight ratio, and large reachable workspace. However, their complex dynamic character and low stiffness with flexible joints make the control design much more difficult than for traditional robot manipulators. In this paper, time delay control (TDC), which combines the proportional-integral–derivative (PID) control method and time delay estimation (TDE) technology, will be investigated to build a model-free controller for CDM. PID parameters are reduced dramatically as TDE compensates for a large proportion of unknown dynamics. To handle the problem in tuning parameters of this controller, artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm is utilized to obtain optimal parameters of PID. Finally, simulations are conducted to verify the effectiveness of the propose controller and the tuning method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.756

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicVibration and Dynamic AnalysisFrench-language works237,207