EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF A NOVEL COMPLIANT AIR BEARING MATERIAL HANDLING SYSTEM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An air bearing materials handling system supports its load on two compliant runners having the form of oval cylinders moving along shallow concave rails. Air is supplied by manifolds integral with the rails through nozzles spaced at intervals in the rail surface. Loads up to 3 tonnes can be moved with an effective coefficient of sliding friction of about 1%. Developed by trial-and-error, the system has incompletely understood features. Two are: the role of the system geometry in providing load support; and the construction of the runners, which consist of layers of cellulose fibre tissue wound onto a core, and enclosed in a plastic cover. Exploratory research aimed at establishing the effect of these features on the load fraction supported by air pressure is reviewed. Flat surface equivalents instrumented for pressure surveys are developed to assess the role of the tissue, and to suggest alternatives. The load fraction is determined, and the response to asymmetric loading is investigated. The minimum number of tissue layers necessary for bearing action is identified, and the performance of compliant alternatives is explored. The review concludes with a discussion of the elements required of a mathematical model suitable for guiding design improvement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".