OPTIMISATION DES CANAUX D’ÉVACUATION DE L’AIR DANS LES BUSES DE SOUFFLAGE DE CONTRÔLE PNEUMATIQUE DIMENSIONNEL
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On confectionne des pièces que l'on appellera tampons, sur lesquels on exécutera des fentes selon diverses configurations comme il sera indiqué plus loin. Ces fentes permettront l'évacuation de l'écoulement de l'air et seront appelées tout au long de cet article "canaux d'évacuations". On mesure la vitesse d’écoulement d’air à la sortie du canal d'évacuation à l’aide d’un anémomètre à fil chaud de type DISA 55M et on mesure également la pression en paroi le long du canal. Les paramètres d’influence sont le retrait δo de la buse de soufflage vis-à-vis de la surface frontale du tampon, la distance δ de ce dernier vis-à-vis de la surface de la paroi à mesurer et la profondeur Pr du canal. La buse utilisée sera celle classique à surface frontale plane désignée industriellement par « buse N°02 ». La largeur L des canaux d’évacuation est 1.5 mm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".