MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802271297 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.170784

Why strengthening primary health care is essential to achieving universal health coverage

2018· article· en· W2802271297 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Chris van Weel, Michael Kidd

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPrimary Care and Health Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrimary health carePrimary careKey (lock)Universal coverageHealth policyHealth careGlobal healthPatient Protection and Affordable Care ActMedicineHealth care reformPolitical scienceEnvironmental healthFamily medicineNursingEconomic growthHealth insuranceComputer sciencePublic healthComputer securityEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[See related article at [www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.180186][2]][2] KEY POINTS Strengthening primary health care[1][2] and the attainment of universal health coverage[2][3],[3][4] are both important current global health policy initiatives. Primary health care is essential and affordable

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.138

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.007
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0080.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations223
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicPrimary Care and Health OutcomesFrench-language works237,207