MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802287959 · doi:10.23977/aetp.2018.21001

Teaching Strategies and Investigative Competences of Postgraduate Students - Faculty of Education – National University of San Marcos, 2017

2018· article· en· W2802287959 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Educational Technology and Psychology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Innovations and Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCronbach's alphaTest (biology)Reliability (semiconductor)Mathematics educationPsychologySample (material)Margin (machine learning)Medical educationComputer scienceMedicinePsychometrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research intends to establish the relationship between teaching strategies and the research competences of postgraduate students - UNMSM, 2017. For this reason, the present scientific study aimed at a quantitative approach of correlational design was established. In order to collect information a questionnaire was elaborated that was applied to the sample conformed by 136 students, to know their points of view with respect to the study variables, also to guarantee its high reliability, the Cronbach's Alpha test was used. On the other hand, the SPSS version 21 computer package was applied, using Spearman's Rho formula with a margin of error of 5%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.187
Threshold uncertainty score0.905

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it