Patterns of Cultural Authority: The National Film Society of Canada and the Institutionalization of Film Education, 1938-1941
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le passage au domaine public de certaines activités dites privées est à l’origine des concepts qui dominent le discours actuel sur le cinéma canadien. Un cas probant est celui des rapports entre le «National Film Society of Canada», agence privée et bénévole et l’Office national du film, institution publique et subventionnée par le gouvernement. Ces rapports ont démontré la nature fragmentaire et incomplète du pouvoir hégémonique. Le NFS a grandement contribué à rendre le cinéma canadien accessible au public et dans les écoles, coordonnant souvent la distribution de films pour l’ONF. Le NFS fut aussi assisté dans ses tâches par le «Canadian Film Committee», un organisme peu connu et éphémère. Le CFC et le NFS ont aidé à introduire l’idée de l’éducation dans le discours sur le cinéma national, ce qui a mis l’emphase sur les questions de citoyenneté au détriment d’autres thèmes reliés à la culture cinématographique nationale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".