MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802342746

Transition Metal Carbides for Thermocatalytic Conversion of Carbon Dioxide via Reverse Water Gas Shift and Sabatier Reactions

2018· dissertation· en· W2802342746 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Faisal Khan

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicCatalysts for Methane Reforming
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWater-gas shift reactionCarbon dioxideCarbideTransition metalChemistryMaterials scienceInorganic chemistryMetallurgyCatalysisOrganic chemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The conversion of carbon dioxide (CO2) to synthetic fuels and chemicals is seen as a promising approach for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Syngas (a mixture of CO and H2) that can be obtained from CO2 via the reverse water gas shift (RWGS) reaction can be further processed through the Fischer Tropsch process to produce higher hydrocarbons. Synthetic natural gas (CH4) produced from the Sabatier reaction can help reducing consumption of fossil fuel and also can serve as an energy reservoir for renewable electricity via power-to-gas. However, utilization of the abovementioned reaction pathways is still limited due to various challenges including catalyst activity, selectivity, and stability. This thesis focuses on the development of catalytic materials for the RWGS and Sabatier reactions.
\n
\nThe first part of this thesis first focuses on a literature overview of recent developments in CO2 conversion through the RWGS and Sabatier reaction. Then, the experimental setup, catalyst synthesis procedures, catalytic performance evaluation, and characterization techniques are outlined.
\n
\nThe second part discusses the results of the two transition metal carbides tested, namely molybdenum carbide (Mo2C) and cobalt carbide (Co2C). The catalytic performance of these catalysts was evaluated as a function of operation parameters for different synthesis procedures. The mechanisms of catalytic reactions are postulated and catalyst characterization results are provided.
\n
\nTo briefly outline the most important findings, the Mo2C catalyst showed nearly complete selectivity towards CO formation at all temperatures tested, whereas the Co2C catalyst appeared to be highly selective towards CH4 formation. The performance of the corresponding metal oxides are also evaluated to evaluate the effect of carburization on the performance of the catalyst. The transitions metal oxides of molybdenum and cobalt both showed a substantial improvement in both conversion and selectivity after the carburization process. The performance of the catalysts supported on Al2O3 at a 1:4 metal-to-support basis was also analyzed. During the stability tests of supported catalysts, CO2 conversions of 84% and 74% were recorded over the Mo2C and Co2C catalysts, respectively, with a negligible drop in catalytic performance after 42 and 64 h time on stream.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicCatalysts for Methane ReformingFrench-language works237,207