MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802365523 · doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000001648

Effects of Age and Sex on Inspiratory Muscle Activation Patterns during Exercise

2018· article· en· W2802365523 on OpenAlexafffund
Yannick Molgat‐Seon, Paolo B. Dominelli, Andrew H. Ramsook, Michele R. Schaeffer, Lee M. Romer, Jeremy Road, Jordan A. Guenette, A. William Sheel

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMichael Smith Health Research BCBritish Columbia Lung AssociationSt. Paul's FoundationProvidence Health CareUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsElectromyographyDiaphragmatic breathingMedicineDiaphragm (acoustics)Internal medicinePhysical therapyCardiologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To characterize the effects of age, sex, and their interaction on inspiratory muscle activation patterns during exercise. METHODS: Twenty younger (20-30 yr, n = 10 women) and 20 older (60-80 yr, n = 10 women) subjects performed an incremental cycle exercise test. Electromyography (EMG) of the scalene (EMGsca) and EMG of the sternocleidomastoid (EMGscm) muscles were measured using skin surface electrodes, whereas diaphragm EMG (EMGdi) and esophageal and transdiaphragmatic pressures were measured using an esophageal catheter. Electromyography data were transformed into root mean square with a 100-ms time constant. Esophageal and diaphragmatic pressure-time products were used as indices of total inspiratory muscle pressure production and diaphragmatic pressure production, respectively. RESULTS: At absolute minute ventilations (V˙E), women and older subjects had greater EMGdi than men and younger subjects, respectively (all P < 0.05), but no differences were noted when V˙E was expressed in relative terms (all P > 0.05). Women had greater EMGsca activity than men at absolute and relative levels of V˙E (all P < 0.05). Older subjects had greater EMGsca than younger subjects when V˙E was expressed in relative (all P < 0.05) but not absolute terms (all P > 0.05). At absolute and relative levels of V˙E, women and older subjects had greater EMGscm than men and younger subjects, respectively (all P < 0.05). Women and older subjects had a greater esophageal and diaphragmatic pressure-time products at a V˙E of 70 L·min than men and younger subjects, respectively (both P < 0.05), but no differences were noted when V˙E was expressed in relative terms (all P > 0.05). No significant interactions between age and sex were noted (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Age and sex significantly affect inspiratory muscle activation patterns during exercise; however, the extent of the effects depends on whether comparisons are made at absolute or relative V˙E.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchFrench-language works237,207