MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802470435 · doi:10.1177/0042098018760108

A method for estimating localised space-use pattern and its applications in integrated land-use transport modelling

2018· article· en· W2802470435 on OpenAlexaff
Ming Zhong, Bilin Yu, Shaobo Liu, John Douglas Hunt, Huini Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueUrban Studies · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Transport and Accessibility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryMinistry of Transportation of Ontario
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Hubei ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSpace (punctuation)Land useMathematical optimizationEstimationPopulationEconometricsComputer scienceMathematicsEconomicsCivil engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contemporary integrated land-use transport models (ILUTMs) explicitly consider interactions between floorspace demand/supply and rent at fine spatial scales, which requires a good understanding between floorspace use pattern and competition of locations among socioeconomic activities. Floorspace use patterns are usually represented by space use coefficients (SUCs) by activity type by zone, which are then used to develop theoretical space-use-rent curves (SURCs), in order to reflect the elasticity between rent and floorspace consumption rates. Literature review indicates that existing studies mostly use borrowed SUCs or subjective judgement methods for synthesising base-year floorspace and developing SURCs. In general, their accuracy is largely unknown and synthesised floorspace could be highly inaccurate. In this study, a linear programming method is proposed to estimate localised SUCs by assuming that zonal population, employment and floorspace total data are available. Study results show that the method can provide localised SUCs and better SURCs than traditional methods. It is found that, as the size of the homogeneous optimisation areas (HOAs) decreases, the accuracy of zonal space totals estimated increases considerably. For example, the estimation error between the observed and estimated zonal space totals reduces from 76.2% under the most aggregate case to 24.7% under the most disaggregate case. The sum of square errors (SSEs) between the optimised SUCs and the SURCs also reduces to about one-quarter of their original values. The method proposed contributes to a procedural process to estimate localised SUCs with known accuracy, which is proved to be a better alternative to traditional synthesis methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.746
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUrban StudiesSame topicUrban Transport and AccessibilityFrench-language works237,207