MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802507337 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2013-0071

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF FREE CONVECTION HEAT TRANSFER IN THE POROUS METAL-FOAM HEAT SINK

2013· article· en· W2802507337 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tzer‐Ming Jeng, Sheng‐Chung Tzeng, Zhi-Ting Yeh

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetal foamMaterials scienceHeat transferHeat sinkHeat transfer coefficientPorosityConvective heat transferMetalConvectionPorous mediumThermodynamicsNatural convectionComposite materialMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study experimentally investigated the free convection heat transfer characteristics of the annular metal-foam heat sinks. The results showed that the heat transfer coefficient (h) decreased as the pore density of metal foams increased when the thickness (t c ) of the annular metal foams equaled 5 mm, but the (h) increased as the pore density increased when t c = 11 and 14.5 mm. Besides, the (h) increased firstly and then decreased as (t c ) increased. There was better heat transfer effect when t c = 11 mm in the present study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicHeat and Mass Transfer in Porous MediaFrench-language works237,207