MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802556760 · doi:10.4000/books.iheid.5834

Les questions de genre dans les contextes de catastrophe naturelle : points clés et pistes de recherche

2007· book-chapter· fr· W2802556760 on OpenAlex
Elaine Enarson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGraduate Institute Publications eBooks · 2007
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRisk Perception and Management
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

S’inscrivant dans des contextes géographiques, culturels, politico-économiques et sociaux différents, les rapports de genre comme les catastrophes naturelles font l’objet de constructions sociales différentes et ont des conséquences sociales complexes pour les femmes et pour les hommes. Mais, afin de nourrir le débat, cet article souligne les points communs et non les différences, les effets négatifs des catastrophes plutôt que les pistes qu’elles ouvrent, et il insiste sur les problèmes que ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.456
GPT teacher head0.442
Teacher spread0.015 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it