Low-Complexity 4-D IIR Filters for Multi-Depth Filtering and Occlusion Suppression in Light Fields
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Light field signal processing allows manipulation of a rich set of information captured from a scene to achieve real-time depth filtering and occlusion suppression. Low-complexity four-dimensional infinite impulse response digital filters for simultaneous depth filtering and occlusion suppression over multiple depths in light fields are proposed. A low-complexity two-dimensional separable approach is employed to design the proposed filters having multiple frequency-planar pass-bands/stopbands in the four-dimensional spatial frequency domain, that can be electronically tuned to enhance/reject planar objects at multiple depths in a light field. Filter synthesis details are provided with specific design examples corresponding to 2-passband and 1-stopband cases. Numerically generated and Lytro camera captured light fields are used to verify the effectiveness of the proposed multi-depth-pass and multi-depth-reject filters. For synthetic light field inputs these filters confirm an average denoising, depth filtering and occlusion suppression performance of 20 dB, 20 dB, and 30 dB, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".