Dom Claude Frollo de Notre-Dame de Paris, moine démoniaque de la tradition des romans noirs ou avatar français de Faust ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le leitmotif du prêtre qui se livre à la luxure et au meurtre atteint son summum dans le roman The Monk de Matthew-Gregory Lewis, où l’auteur explore les profondeurs de la dépravation sexuelle chez le moine Ambrosio. Les nombreuses similarités entre Ambrosio et Claude Frollo de Notre-Dame de Paris sont bien connues, car dans ces deux romans, l’auteur dépeint la « descente aux enfers » d’un homme d’église. Or nous tenons à démontrer que c’est par le biais d’un mélange du mythe faustien et du moine sadique du roman noir, que Notre-Dame de Paris complique de très loin la signification accordée traditionnellement entre les deux forces opposées du bien et du mal, surtout en ce qui concerne l’archidiacre Claude Frollo. Loin d’être un agent du mal comme Ambrosio, ou un érudit à la recherche de l’absolu comme Faust- Claude Frollo est plutôt une victime du destin, de l’anankè.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".