MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802584057 · doi:10.3168/jds.2017-13848

Genome-wide association study and in silico functional analysis of the number of embryos produced by Holstein donors

2018· article· en· W2802584057 on OpenAlexafffundabout
C. Jaton, Flávio S. Schenkel, Mehdi Sargolzaei, A. Cánova, F. Malchiodi, Christopher A. Price, Christine F. Baes, F. Miglior

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologySNPGenome-wide association studySingle-nucleotide polymorphismGeneticsSNP arrayGenetic associationGeneGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Superovulation or ovum pick-up and in vitro fertilization are technologies used to produce an increased number of embryos from elite females. Embryo production traits have been shown to be heritable, but the genes that cause this variability have not yet been assessed. The main objectives of this study were to perform a genome-wide association study (GWAS) to find single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) associated with embryo production traits and to identify candidate genes affecting the number of embryos produced by Holstein donors in Canada that may provide insight into the regulation of embryo production. Breeding values were estimated and de-regressed for all donors and sires using a data set of 150,971 records of superovulation or ovum pick-up and in vitro fertilization. A total of 11,607 animals were genotyped, but of that number only 5,118 were genotyped with at least a 50K SNP panel and had a de-regressed estimated breeding value reliability of at least 10%. For the GWAS, 606,406 imputed SNP on 29 autosomal chromosomes were considered after applying quality control measures. A single-SNP univariate mixed linear animal model was used to perform the GWAS, and a 5% false discovery rate was applied to adjust for multiple testing. We found 36 and 14 significant SNP associated with the total number of embryos and the number of viable embryos, respectively, with most of them located on chromosome 11. Using these significant SNP, positional genes located within 10,000 bp upstream and downstream of the SNP were retrieved. Thirteen genes were harboring or near the significant SNP for the total number of embryos, 4 of them also being near the significant SNP for viable embryos. Some of these genes (CRB2, DENND1A, MAD1L1, NDUFA8, PTGS1) could be considered as potential positional candidate genes related to the number of embryos produced by a donor. This list will need to be validated in an independent population to confirm the role of the genes for embryo production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy ScienceSame topicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockFrench-language works237,207