MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802589996 · doi:10.4000/belphegor.2276

La première phase de la culture médiatique en Hongrie (1840-1920)

2020· article· fr· W2802589996 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sándor Kálai

Bibliographic record

VenueBelphégor · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Identity and Heritage
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contrairement à la France, à la Grande-Bretagne ou aux États-Unis, la modernité massmédiatique ne s’épanouit en Hongrie qu’au début du XXe siècle. On peut considérer la période de 1840 à 1920 comme une première phase, l’âge d’or étant la période qui dure de 1920 à 1945. Cette première phase (1840-1920) se caractérise par son plurilinguisme, dont nous montrons les conséquences. A cause de la situation complexe des ethnies et des confessions, de l’interaction entre assimilation et modernisation, on ne peut pas adopter les conceptions occidentales de la bourgeoisie ou de la culture de masse-médiatique. A cause de cette situation multilinguistique et multiethnique le chercheur doit être plus attentif aux processus de résistance des minorités, tant linguistiques qu’ethniques. Ce sont ces aspects que nous nous attachons à étudier ici.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.663
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBelphégorSame topicCultural Identity and HeritageFrench-language works237,207