Poisson Limits for Sequential Multivariate Multinomial Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A well known result in probability is the Poisson limit for rare independent Bernoulli trials. The asymptotic result also holds for a multinomial setting where events are dependent. An interesting data type is a survival process in which one observes many individuals over time periods. The risk set is all those available at the beginning of each time period, thus the same individual can appear in successive risk sets. Individuals exit rarely. In our motivating example these are corporations who exit a public trading system by default or merger, so there are several exit types, hence the multinomial setting. There are also covariates available at the beginning of each period. We study the numbers of exits over time. Under rare multinomial conditions we show that the exits types converge to independent Poisson laws with respect to the exit types and also with respect to time. An immediate application is the construction of one step ahead predictions which may then be tabulated or plotted, giving a convenient tool to study themodel behaviour with respect to time. Thus one can obtain one step ahead prediction intervals for the number of exits of each type, in our case bankruptcy or merger. This is a tool that is useful for large institutional investors such as pension plans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.041 | 0.185 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".