MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802656762 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsy061.1012

1013 Novel Quantitative EEG Exposures and Risk of Incident MCI and Dementia in Older Women

2018· article· en· W2802656762 on OpenAlexaff
Katie L. Stone, Katherine E. Peters, Susan Redline, Kristine Yaffe, Shaun Purcell, Sara Mariani, Ina Djonlagic, Magdy Younes

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCognitive Functions and Memory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDementiaCognitive declineElectroencephalographyNeuropsychologyAudiologyCognitionOdds ratioCognitive testMedicineLogistic regressionPsychologyPsychiatryInternal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We and others have reported that quantitative EEG indices may serve as biomarkers for predicting onset of dementia or cognitive decline. We tested whether newly derived EEG indices predict onset of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), dementia, or clinically significant cognitive decline in older women. 294 older women (82.3 ± 3.2 years) without cognitive impairment completed overnight polysomnography in 2002–2004, and returned for cognitive testing 5 years later. Women were classified at follow-up as normal, MCI or dementia based on neuropsychological evaluation. Baseline EEG was analyzed for alpha-intrusion (%NREM sleep with alpha power>30μV2), normalized overall power (average of ratios [patient/group average] of power in different frequency bands) and Odds-Ratio-Product (ORP; an index of sleep depth) in different stages. Logistic regression was used to determine the association of EEG exposures and risk of incident MCI or dementia, and clinically significant cognitive decline based on 3MS scores (>= 5 points decline), adjusting for race, age, and education levels. At follow-up, 188 women were classified as cognitively normal, 60 as MCI, and 46 as dementia. 78 of 284 women experienced cognitive decline based on the 3MS. Older women with higher alpha intrusion were more likely to experience cognitive decline (OR=1.37; 95% CI 1.07–1.75 per 1 standard deviation increase), or develop MCI or dementia (OR=1.29; 1.01 - 1.64) during follow-up. Those with higher normalized overall power experienced increased risk of both cognitive decline (OR=1.34; 1.02 - 1.75) and MCI/dementia (OR=1.45; 1.11 - 1.88). Higher average ORP, both overall and during REM sleep, suggested a protective effect for development of dementia (p < .10 for both). Quantitative EEG parameters may help identify older adults at risk of future development of MCI/dementia and significant cognitive decline. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) is supported by National Institutes of Health funding. The National Institute on Aging (NIA) provides support under the following grant numbers: R01 AG005407, R01 AR35582, R01 AR35583, R01 AR35584, R01 AG005394, R01 AG027574, R01 AG027576, and R01 AG026720.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicCognitive Functions and MemoryFrench-language works237,207