MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802685238 · doi:10.5040/9798216184775.ch-052

Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin

2013· other· en· W2802685238 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiterature Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1852 Introduction: Harriet Beecher Stowe (1811–1896) was born in Litchfield, Connecticut. She was the daughter of Lyman Beecher, a Presbyterian minister who was also a temperance advocate and an abolitionist. Her husband, Calvin Ellis Stowe, was a theologian who taught at a seminary. The Stowes were strongly opposed to slavery and helped runaway slaves find their way to Canada through the Underground Railroad. In 1850 Harriet Beecher Stowe began writing fictional articles for the magazine National Era about the life of a slave, Uncle Tom, and his family. The story begins with a Kentucky plantation owner, Arthur Shelby, having to sell a slave, Uncle Tom, to pay debts. Below is a small selection from the novel focused on Aunt Chloe, an excellent cook who is Uncle Tom’s wife. Aunt Chloe proposes to the Shelbys that she be rented out to raise money so she can buy back Uncle Tom, who has been sold to a barbarous man, Simon Legree. Aunt Chloe will earn enough money to buy back Uncle Tom, but by then he is dying. These articles were collected into a two-volume novel, Uncle Tom’s Cabin, that was published in 1852. A play based on the book was released the following year. The book sold more copies than did any book other than the Bible. Uncle Tom’s Cabin galvanized the North in opposition to slavery and angered many in the South. Some observers have claimed that Uncle Tom’s Cabin was a contributing factor in causing the Civil War.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.172
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1750.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLiterature Analysis and CriticismFrench-language works237,207