MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802689193 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2012-0010

CALCULATION AND APPLICATION OF HOURLY EMISSION FACTORS FOR INCREASED ACCURACY IN SCOPE TWO EMISSION CALCULATIONS

2012· article· en· W2802689193 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Kurt Frommann, Evan DiValentino

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsNiagara College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScope (computer science)Renewable energyGreenhouse gasElectricityEnvironmental scienceGridScale (ratio)Environmental economicsComputer scienceEngineeringMathematicsElectrical engineeringPhysicsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The accepted method of calculating GHG emissions from the consumption of grid-purchased electricity, otherwise known as scope two emissions, is limited to one emission factor that represents an annual average. The emission intensities of large-scale electrical grids change by the hour, therefore requiring hourly precision in emission calculations for optimal accuracy. For the power market of Ontario, Christian Gordon and Alan Fung of Ryerson University have developed a method of generating hourly emission factors to better measure the impact of renewable technologies. Although calculations using this method demonstrate improvement from the e-grid average, results can be further improved through the use of facility-specific emission factors and consistent units of measurement. This paper recommends a modified methodology that yields more accurate hourly emission calculations and provides opportunity in quantifying scope two emissions with a high degree of precision.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.516
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207