MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802704792 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2018.8351652

An Energy-Efficient CMOS Biophotometry Sensor With Incremental DT-∑Δ ADC Conversion

2018· article· en· W2802704792 on OpenAlexaff
Mehdi Noormohammadi Khiarak, Kiyotaka Sasagawa, Takashi Tokuda, Jun Ohta, Sylvain Martel, Yves De Koninck, Benoit Gosselin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCMOSDecimationCorrelated double samplingPhotodiodeNoise (video)Duty cycleSampling (signal processing)Sensitivity (control systems)ChipMaterials scienceElectronic engineeringFilter (signal processing)PhysicsComputer scienceOptoelectronicsVoltageElectrical engineeringAmplifierEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a high-sensitivity incremental discrete time <b xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Σ</b> Δ analog-to-digital converter (ADC) with variable clock and on-chip decimation for biophotometry sensing. A digital correlated double sampling (CDS) scheme is merged with the decimation filter for providing energy- and area-efficient mean to suppress low-frequency noise. Chopper modulation and differential sensing using a dummy photodiode along with charge transfer switches are used as well to allow for the detection of ultra low-input low fluorescence light, down to a few femttowatt, by suppressing the low-frequency noise of the <b xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Σ</b> Δ modulator and the dark current of the photodetector. A variable clock scheme is used across the sensor operating phases (namely the reset conversion phase and the signal conversion phase) to decrease the biosensor conversion time. To decrease illumination time and save the excitation light source energy, the biosensor uses a short sensing duty cycle of 1.2 ms (12%) for a sampling period of 10 ms. The proposed optoelectronic biosensor is implemented in a 0.18-μm CMOS technology, consuming 56 μW from a 3.3/1.8-V supply voltage, while achieving a high signal-to-noise and distortion ratio of 101 dB and a minimum detectable current of <; 100-fArms, within conversion time of 1.2 ms. The proposed biosensor presents a FOM of 0.73 pJ/conv., which is among the best reported performances compared to previous solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.291
Threshold uncertainty score0.744

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCCD and CMOS Imaging SensorsFrench-language works237,207