Moving Pictures and Costume Songs at the 1927 “Exhibition of Canadian West Coast Art, Native and Modern”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En 1927, Nass River Indians et Totem Land furent produits spécifiquement pour être présentés à l'intérieur d'une exposition au Musée des beaux arts du Canada qui réunissait des oeuvres autochtones de la côte ouest et des tableaux et sculptures d’artistes euro-canadiens importants. Il ne s’agit là que de l’un des nombreux contextes dans lesquels ces films anthropologiques ont circulé. Il est donc important de ne pas examiner ces textes isolément dans le cadre d’une histoire du film ethnographique canadien. On se doit plutôt de les situer dans le cadre beaucoup plus large d’une « histoire de l’art » de cette culture matérielle que Fatima Tobing Rony a appelé « l’ethnographique », c’est-à-dire, ces peuples que le cinéma ethnographique présenta comme « n’ayant aucune histoire, aucune écriture, aucune civilisation, aucune technologie et aucune archive ».
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".