MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802732880 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2016-0020

DESIGN AND TESTING OF A NEW WATER SUPPLY DEVICE

2016· article· en· W2802732880 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Cong Cui, Xili Duan, Weiyan Ren, Yulu Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring Technologies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutflowWater supplyInletPipeline transportEnvironmental scienceMode (computer interface)Water pressureVolumetric flow rateWater pipePressure sensorMarine engineeringPetroleum engineeringFlow (mathematics)Water flowComputer scienceEngineeringProcess engineeringMechanical engineeringEnvironmental engineeringMechanicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When water is supplied from pressurized pipelines, the high pressure often causes waste of water by splashing and unnecessarily high flow rates. In this research, an innovative new water supply device is designed to overcome this problem. In this device water is supplied in the form of overflow by automatically adjusting water pressure at the inlet. This paper presents the mechanical design of the new faucet and explains how it operates in sensor mode and bypass mode. Experimental results show that the new design achieves near-zero outflow pressure and can still provide rapid water supply when required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicWater Quality Monitoring TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207