Propuesta de un plan de mejoramiento urbanístico-ambiental del centro cívico de la ciudad de Trujillo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
If we consider that a development plan of a city should be built on the four pillars of sustainable development: environmental, economic, social and institutional participation, the development of the civic center of the city of Trujillo through its history has not followed or respected these postulates , since in principle be built in Santa Catalina valley lands that were more suitable for agricultural development and maintaining livestock populations, thereby breaking social and economic progress makes it constitutes today in a chaotic, polluted , choking and with limited possibilities for progress and sustainable development. Against this this work was directed to propose a plan to improve urban environmental Trujillo Civic Center, based on aspects that tend to regulate their national strategic population growth, largely counteracting pollution technically managing the fleet and redistribution of major industries, companies, considering restoration programs and improving its infrastructure and sanitation considering other high-end technology to remedy all the negatives that has generated over the years. Finally programs are proposed: a) restoration, rebuilding dilapidated buildings too respecting the history and future progress of Trujillo; b) Reorganization of vehicular traffic and modernization. c) Improving the infrastructure of water supply and drainage, cleaning and improvement of parks and gardens, d) mitigation of environmental pollution is leading to health problems of the people as stress, deafness, nervous and cardiovascular disease, impaired monuments, statues, houses, churches, etc.. e) environmental education as continuous, permanent and compulsory for all residents of the city of Trujillo f) Dissemination of the principles of sustainable development as a way of life, to ensure the continuity of life, not only in Montreal, but all Earth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".