IL-33 and Its Receptor ST2 after Inhaled Allergen Challenge in Allergic Asthmatics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous murine models have demonstrated interleukin (IL)-33 to be an important mediator of type-2 inflammation and to promote airway hyperresponsiveness in allergic asthma. A number of inflammatory cells produce IL-33 and eosinophils express ST2 mRNA. The relationship between IL-33 and eosinophils in allergic asthma, however, remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to evaluate in vitro the effect of allergen inhalation on IL-33 levels and expression of its receptor (ST2L) on eosinophils in allergic asthmatics, and the effect of IL-33 stimulation on eosinophil activity. METHODS: Plasma and sputum IL-33, soluble ST2 (sST2) levels, and ST2L expression on eosinophils were measured in 10 healthy controls and 10 allergic asthmatics. Asthmatics underwent allergen and diluent inhalation challenges. Blood and sputum samples were collected to measure IL-33, sST2, and ST2L eosinophil expression before and 24 h after allergen inhalation. Purified blood eosinophils from allergic asthmatics were incubated overnight with IL-33 to assess ST2 and intracellular IL-5 expression. RESULTS: Baseline levels of IL-33 in sputum and sST2 in plasma and sputum were similar in allergic asthmatics compared to healthy controls. In addition, there was no difference in blood or sputum eosinophil ST2L expression in healthy controls versus allergic asthmatics. Eosinophil ST2L expression was significantly increased 24 h postallergen inhalation in allergic asthmatics. In vitro stimulation of human eosinophils with IL-33 and LPS significantly increased eosinophil ST2L expression and IL-33 stimulation increased intracellular IL-5 expression, which was attenuated by treatment with sST2 and ST2 blockade. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In mild asthmatics, there was a significant upregulation of ST2 surface expression on eosinophils from blood and sputum following allergen inhalation challenge. In vitro, IL-33 stimulation of eosinophils increases both ST2 membrane expression and IL-5 production. These results support a role for IL-33 in causing allergen-induced eosinophilia. Blockade of IL-33 and ST2 signaling may present a novel therapeutic avenue for asthma treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".