MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802885703

Modeling Surface Mass Load Displacements Along The Cascadia Subduction Zone

2018· article· en· W2802885703 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cody T Norberg

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Mathematics Enthusiast · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubductionGeologySeismologyGeodesySurface (topology)GeometryTectonics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Earth’s surface is under constant strain from different mass loads. Surface mass loads, such as the oceans, atmosphere, and continental water reservoirs, exert forces on the elastic solid Earth, inducing crustal deformation. These loads move over Earth's surface on time scales varying from less than a day to many thousand years. Since the Earth is elastic and not perfectly rigid, the pressure from these loads deforms the shape of Earth’s surface. Horizontal and vertical displacement responses due to a load can be recorded using Global Positioning System (GPS) receivers. Modeling and removing surface-mass loading signals, which are present in all GPS time series, can reduce the variance in the time series. Surface deformation is of particular interest along subduction zones. A subduction zone is an area of tectonic plate collision where the more dense plate subducts, or moves underneath, the less dense plate. The Cascadia Subduction Zone extends from Vancouver Island down to Northern California. This research project focuses on using the python-based software program LOADDEF to accurately compute displacement responses of the Earth to oceanic, atmospheric, and hydrologic loads. These modeled responses are then compared to the observed displacement responses measured by the Plate Boundary Observatory along the Cascadia Subduction Zone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score0.411

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Mathematics EnthusiastSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207