MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802916043 · doi:10.21831/inersia.v14i1.19491

RUANG SAKRAL DAN PROFAN DALAM ARSITEKTUR MASJID AGUNG DEMAK, JAWA TENGAH

2018· article· en· W2802916043 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueINERSIA lnformasi dan Ekspose Hasil Riset Teknik Sipil dan Arsitektur · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchitectural and Urban Studies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
FundersUniversitas Gadjah Mada
KeywordsWorshipIslamHumanitiesMeaning (existential)ArtTheologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACTDemak Great Mosque is a mosque of historical heritage during the Islamic kingdoms in the 14th century. Until now, this mosque still has an important share for the community as a place of religious worship and considered sacred. Against this background and the social conditions of society have developed, there is an indication that the Great Mosque of Demak has its own meaning on the spaces within the mosque-related to sacred and profane. The purpose of this research is to identify the sacred and profane space in the architecture of the Grand Mosque of Demak and identify the factors that influence the formation of the properties of the space. This research uses rationalistic approach and deductive qualitative method. The result of this study reveals that in its use, the spaces at the Great Mosque of Demak are divided into a room that is not worldly (sacred) and the room that is worldly (profane). Space that is (not worldly) is liwan and pawestren. While the worldly room is pawestren and porch. Factors affecting the sanctity of space are physical barriers and holiness of worship space. While sanctity becomes a legitimate requirement of worship activities, so it becomes the main requirement of the sacred or not a place.Keywords: Demak, Mosque, Profane, Sacred ABSTRAKMasjid Agung Demak adalah masjid warisan sejarah selama kerajaan Islam di abad ke-14. Hingga saat ini, masjid ini masih memiliki andil penting bagi masyarakat sebagai tempat ibadah dan dianggap sakral. Dengan latar belakang ini dan kondisi sosial masyarakat telah berkembang, ada indikasi bahwa Masjid Agung Demak memiliki maknanya sendiri di ruang-ruang di dalam masjid yang berkaitan dengan sakral dan profan. Tujuan dari Kajian ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi ruang sakral dan profan dalam arsitektur Masjidil Haram dan mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi terbentuknya sifat ruang. Kajian ini menggunakan pendekatan rasionalistik dan metode kualitatif deduktif. Hasil Kajian ini mengungkapkan bahwa dalam penggunaannya, ruang di Masjid Agung Demak terbagi menjadi ruangan yang tidak bersifat duniawi (sakral) dan ruangan yang bersifat duniawi (profan). Ruang yang (bukan duniawi) adalah liwan dan pawestren. Sedangkan ruang duniawi adalah pawestren dan serambi. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kesucian ruang adalah penghalang fisik dan kesucian ruang ibadah. Sedangkan kesucian menjadi kebutuhan ibadah yang sah, sehingga menjadi kebutuhan utama yang sakral atau bukan tempat.Kata kunci: Demak, Masjid, Profane, Sakral

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.683
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it