MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

1711b Inrs and international cooperation

2018· article· en· W2802920007 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stéphane Pimbert

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicChemical Safety and Risk Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEurosTask (project management)FrenchOccupational safety and healthPolitical scienceBusinessLibrary scienceGeographyEngineeringHumanitiesComputer scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The INRS, national institute of research and security, established in 1947, has the task of preventing workplace accidents and occupational diseases in France. It gathers 600 permanent workers, with 80 million euros as an annual budget. Its operating modes are: Studies and researches Support for companies Training Information and communication At an international level, the INRS participates in ISSA works, mainly with the research and chemistry committee, the ILO and the WHO. It plays a part in CIST/ICOH works. It also elaborates cooperation projects with organisations such as the NIOSH (USA), IRSST (Quebec), IFA (Germany), KOSHA (South Korea), and IST (Switzerland). The INRS is a part of the PEROSH network that includes major research organisations in the field of occupational health in Europe. The INRS is also a part of the EUROSHNET network, which is a network of European normalizers. About the francophone cooperation, the INRS established many cooperation projects like with the ISST (Tunisia), faculty of medicine of Casablanca, Mediterranean and Tunisian society of occupational medicine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.380
Threshold uncertainty score0.884

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3800.207

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicChemical Safety and Risk ManagementFrench-language works237,207