O Cinema Dito dos Primeiros Tempos: um Caldo de Cultura em Plena Ebulição...
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumo A noção de séries culturais permite pensar visões e discursos alternativos sobre as condições para o advento do cinema. Numa perspectiva que considera a "polifonia" institucional e cultural que precede e caracteriza os primeiros tempos do cinema, onde se inscrevem notadamente o praxinoscópio, a lanterna mágica e o kinetoscópio de Edison, trata-se de estabelecer a série cultural da animação como quadro de referência para o conjunto da rescinematografica. Se o paradigma da captação-restituição própria ao cinematógrafo Lumière parecia até agora dominar no seio da instituição como no da produção cinematográfica, o retorno da animação de imagens como princípio fundador do cinema enseja compreender sua verdadeira força diferencial e sua capacidade de adaptação perante as numerosas crises identitárias atravessadas, dentre as quais a hibridação digital e a porosidade generalizada ligada à convergência de plataformas e mídias atuais.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".