MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802954545

Search-based model optimization using model transformations

2014· article· en· W2802954545 on OpenAlexaff
Joachim Denil, Māris Jukšs, Clark Verbrugge, Hans Vangheluwe

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicModel-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRepresentation (politics)Set (abstract data type)Model-driven architectureTransformation (genetics)Domain (mathematical analysis)Space (punctuation)Model transformationOptimization problemMathematical optimizationArtificial intelligenceTheoretical computer scienceAlgorithmUnified Modeling LanguageProgramming languageMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Design-Space Exploration (DSE) and optimization look for a suitable and optimal candidate solution to a problem, with respect to a set of quality criteria, by searching through a space of possible solution designs. Search-Based Optimization (SBO) is a well-known technique for design-space exploration and optimization. Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) offers many benefits for creating a general approach to SBO, through a suitable problem representation. In MDE, model transformation is the preferred technique to manipulate models. The challenge thus lies in adapting model transformations to perform SBO tasks. In this paper, we demonstrate that multiple SBO techniques are easily incorporated into MDE. Through a non-trivial example of electrical circuit generation, we show how this approach can be applied, how it enables simple switching between different SBO approaches, and integrates domain knowledge, all within the modeling paradigm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.267
Threshold uncertainty score0.440

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicModel-Driven Software Engineering TechniquesFrench-language works237,207