FORCE-MOMENT CAPABILITIES OF REVOLUTE-JOINTED PLANAR PARALLEL MANIPULATORS WITH ADDITIONAL ACTUATED BRANCHES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The force-moment capabilities of revolute-jointed planar parallel manipulators (PPMs) are presented. A previously developed analysis that determines explicitly the force-moment capabilities of parallel manipulators is considered and the formulation is improved. This analysis is based upon properly adjusting the actuator outputs to their maximum capabilities. The force-moment capabilities of two actuation layouts are investigated: the non-redundant 3-RRR PPM and the redundantly actuated 4-RRR PPM, where the underline indicates the actuated joint. Four studies of force-moment capabilities are presented: maximum force with a prescribed moment, maximum applicable force, maximum moment with a prescribed force, and maximum applicable moment. These studies are performed for constant payload orientation of the mobile platform throughout the manipulator’s workspace. It is concluded that the manipulator with the additional actuated branch shows an improvement of the force-moment capabilities at the expense of reducing its workspace.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".