MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2803161762 · doi:10.1109/mcom.2018.8360845

Achieving Energy Efficiency and Sustainability in Edge/Fog Deployment

2018· article· en· W2803161762 on OpenAlexaff
Neeraj Kumar, Joel J. P. C. Rodrigues, Mohsen Guizani, Kim‐Kwang Raymond Choo, Rongxing Lu, Christos Verikoukis, Zhimeng Zhong

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Magazine · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoftware deploymentComputer scienceEdge computingEfficient energy useEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionWearable computerEdge deviceMobile edge computingEnergy consumptionSustainabilityFocus (optics)The InternetTelecommunicationsComputer securityCloud computingEmbedded systemWorld Wide WebElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The twelve articles in this special section focus on energy efficiency as it relates to fog or edge computing. The Internet of Things (IoT) has emerged as one of the most advanced and complex technological trends, where more than 50 billion things will be connected (e.g., mobile devices, sensors, wearable devices, and other computing nodes) to the Internet by 2020. Edge/fog computing will play an increasingly important role in handling the information flow of such large and complex networks. An unintended consequence is the impact of their operations on carbon emissions and the resulting electricity costs. Thus, there has been focus on designing energy-efficient solutions for the edge-fog environment. In this Feature Topic, state-of-the-art research advances in energy efficiency and sustainability for edge/fog deployment are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.843
Threshold uncertainty score0.608

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications MagazineSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207