MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2803214581

Quebec’s Pay Equity Act: An Innovative Policy for Reducing the Gender Pay Gap

2008· article· en· W2803214581 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rosette Côté

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue française d’administration publique · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommissionPay EquityEquity (law)Gender pay gapAgency (philosophy)Context (archaeology)Public administrationSocial equalityPublic economicsBusinessPolitical sciencePublic relationsEconomicsLabour economicsSociologyFinanceLawSocial science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Pay Equity Commission is Quebec’s public agency in charge of interpreting and applying the 1996 Pay Equity Act, which aims to reduce discriminatory pa y differentials between men and women in the pro vince’s public and private sectors. Drawing on her experience as head of the Commission as well as literature on the subject, the author outlines the context in which it was created, its specific characteristics and achievements, the positions of the social actors when it was first created and in 2008, a nd the threats and challenges it will face in the next decade.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.851
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue française d’administration publiqueSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207