MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2803216406 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2018.37

An autopsy case of small vessel, childhood, primary angiitis of the central nervous system (SVcPACNS): suggestions for establishing specific histologic criteria for diagnosis

2018· article· en· W2803216406 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Christopher Dunham

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVasculitis and related conditions
Canadian institutionsBC Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAutopsyPathologyFibrinoid necrosisBrain biopsyEncephalitisGiant cellCyclophosphamideBiopsyVasculitisDiseaseImmunologySurgeryChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SVcPACNS is a rare inflammatory/immune disorder that typically affects the small blood vessels of the brain. SVcPACNS differs from most adult forms of PACNS by being predominantly lymphocytic, non-granulomatous and non-necrotizing. Previously healthy children are typically affected by range of signs and symptoms, including: seizures, headache, cognitive decline, behavior/personality change, focal neurological deficits and potentially a decreased level of consciousness. Treatment protocols featuring induction (steroids and cyclophosphamide) and subsequent maintenance phases (e.g., mycophenolate mofetil) have been demonstrated to yield favorable outcomes. Since SVcPACNS is characteristically angiography negative, the diagnostic gold standard is brain biopsy. Interpretation of these biopsies is often challenging given the histologic overlap between SVcPACNS and encephalitis. Distinguishing the foregoing is critical since the treatment of these entities is significantly different. Herein, a rare autopsy case of SVcPACNS in a 4 year old male is presented. This case provides a unique opportunity to review the Alrawi criteria for the histologic diagnosis of PACNS and establish/refine criteria specific to SVcPACNS. Generally, such criteria should feature: 1) an intramural and lymphocyte predominant infiltrate devoid of multinucleated giant cells; 2) structural vessel alterations lacking fibrinoid necrosis; 3) perivascular pathology supportive of an angiocentric process; 4) the absence of encephalitis; and, 5) the absence of a concurrent systemic or rheumatic illness that could account for the CNS findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques→Same topicVasculitis and related conditions→French-language works237,207→